Today's News: Federal Judge Blocks Trump from Banning International Students at Harvard
The ruling, issued swiftly after the lawsuit was filed, prevents immediate harm to the university’s nearly 7,000 international students.
Photo: Scott Eisen/Getty Images
Overview
Date: May 23, 2025
Topic: Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration from Banning International Students at Harvard
Summary: A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order blocking the Trump administration’s attempt to revoke Harvard University's ability to enroll international students. The administration had cited Harvard’s alleged failure to combat antisemitism and respond to requests for disciplinary records as justification. Harvard sued, claiming the action was unconstitutional retaliation for resisting ideological interference. The ruling, issued swiftly after the lawsuit was filed, prevents immediate harm to the university’s nearly 7,000 international students. A hearing is set for the following week to determine whether a preliminary injunction should be granted.
Sources
The New York Times: Judge Blocks Trump Effort to Bar International Students at Harvard
Fox News: Judge temporarily pauses Trump move to cancel Harvard student visa policy after lawsuit
The Washington Post: Judge temporarily blocks effort to ban Harvard from enrolling foreign students
The Wall Street Journal: Judge Halts Government’s Move to Bar International Students at Harvard
Key Points
A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order against the Trump administration’s revocation of Harvard’s ability to host international students.
The administration’s action was based on Harvard’s alleged failure to provide full disciplinary records of student visa holders.
Harvard sued, arguing the move violated its First Amendment rights and was a politically motivated attempt to control academic ideology.
The decision affects roughly 7,000 international students at Harvard, over 25% of the student body.
The administration has already frozen billions in federal funding to Harvard and launched multiple investigations into its campus policies.
Unique Highlights
CNN noted Homeland Security's additional demand for five years of international student conduct records within 72 hours and highlighted student and faculty reactions, including direct student interviews.
The New York Times reported that this was Harvard’s second lawsuit against the administration and detailed the broader campaign of federal agency pressure and potential endowment tax increases.
Fox News included specific details about the requested footage of protests and past disciplinary incidents involving international students.
The Washington Post featured DHS Secretary Kristi Noem’s accusation that Harvard trained Chinese Communist Party affiliates.
The Wall Street Journal emphasized the financial stakes, citing lost research funding and threats to Harvard’s tax-exempt status.
NBC News quoted Harvard's internal communications and highlighted The Crimson’s editorial condemning the administration's move.
Contrasting Details
CNN and The New York Times both frame the administration’s actions as ideologically driven retaliation, while Fox News emphasizes enforcement of immigration law in response to alleged antisemitic and violent activities.
The Washington Post and CNN highlight the emotional and academic turmoil experienced by international students; Fox News focuses more on administrative and legal aspects.
CNN and NBC News explicitly cite the administration’s targeting of foreign students in response to protests; Fox News stresses national security and legal compliance.
The Wall Street Journal underscores the financial dependency on international tuition, while The New York Times stresses Harvard’s identity as inherently international.
The Newsie Project uses AI to summarize, compare, and contrast the reporting of the major US and world online news sources.
This is an evolving project. Tools, approaches, and output formats will change over time. The Newsie Project does not attempt to provide a definitive capsule of any news story. While the incidence of errors in these summaries is low, and I attempt to spot-check details, AI tools can hallucinate. Please click through and read the articles for details (some may be paywalled).