Today's News: Judge Finds Probable Cause to Hold Trump Administration in Contempt Over Deportation Flights

Boasberg said the administration showed “willful disregard” for the court and outlined next steps for possible criminal contempt proceedings.

Photo: Alex Brandon/Pool/AFP/Getty Images

Overview

• Date: April 16, 2025

• Topic: Judge Boasberg Finds Probable Cause to Hold Trump Administration in Criminal Contempt Over Deportation Flights

• Summary: U.S. District Judge James Boasberg ruled that the Trump administration likely violated his court order by proceeding with deportation flights of Venezuelan migrants under the Alien Enemies Act, despite a judicial directive to halt them. The migrants were sent to a maximum-security prison in El Salvador without due process. Boasberg said the administration showed “willful disregard” for the court and outlined next steps for possible criminal contempt proceedings, including sworn declarations, live testimony, and the potential appointment of a special prosecutor if the Justice Department does not act. The case underscores escalating tensions between the executive and judiciary branches amid an aggressive deportation agenda by the Trump administration.

Sources

• The New York Times – Judges Challenge White House Over Disregard for Court Orders - The New York Times

• CNN – Boasberg finds ‘probable cause exists’ to hold Trump administration in contempt for violating orders on deportation flights

• NBC News – Judge finds cause to hold Trump administration in criminal contempt over deportation flights

• Fox News – Federal Judge James Boasberg finds probable cause to hold Trump in contempt over deportation flights

• The Washington Post – Judge Boasberg to launch contempt proceedings into Trump administration

• The Wall Street Journal – Judge Finds Probable Cause to Hold Trump Administration in Criminal Contempt

Key Points

• Judge Boasberg determined the Trump administration willfully violated a March 15 order to halt deportation flights, resulting in probable cause for criminal contempt.

• The administration deported over 130 Venezuelan migrants to a Salvadoran prison before the written order was filed, claiming ambiguity between oral and written instructions.

• The court’s authority, even when later overturned by the Supreme Court on procedural grounds, remains binding until reversed, according to Boasberg.

• Boasberg outlined a multi-stage process to identify responsible officials, including depositions, sworn declarations, and possibly appointing a special prosecutor if the Justice Department declines prosecution.

• The administration argues national security and executive authority justify its actions; Boasberg and legal scholars counter that judicial orders must be obeyed regardless of interbranch tensions.

Unique Highlights

• The New York Times provides extensive detail on Boasberg’s proposed enforcement mechanisms, including his roadmap for escalating contempt proceedings.

• CNN includes expert commentary from legal analysts like Steve Vladeck and contextualizes the ruling within a broader trend of judicial resistance to the Trump administration.

• NBC News cites social media posts by administration officials that Boasberg interpreted as mocking judicial authority, adding to the contempt findings.

• Fox News emphasizes the administration’s framing of the court’s actions as overreach and includes Justice Department arguments defending the deportations.

• The Washington Post offers historical context on contempt findings against executive officials and outlines similar judicial actions in parallel immigration cases.

• The Wall Street Journal adds insight into the Trump administration's legal strategies and quotes scholars noting the rarity and legal complexity of criminal contempt actions against federal officials.

Contrasting Details

• Fox News and The Wall Street Journal stress the administration’s defense that the written order superseded the oral one and present the contempt action as a judicial overreach into foreign policy.

• CNN, The New York Times, and The Washington Post focus on the judiciary’s assertion that any court order must be followed until overturned, regardless of its form or perceived merit.

• NBC News and The New York Times report administration boasts on social media as evidence of willful defiance, while Fox News omits or minimizes these details.

• The Wall Street Journal and CNN note the administration’s argument that national security concerns and state secrets prevent full disclosure—Boasberg strongly contests this claim.

---

The Newsie Project uses AI to summarize, compare, and contrast the reporting of the major US and world online news sources.

This is an evolving project. Tools, approaches, and output formats will change over time. The Newsie Project does not attempt to provide a definitive capsule of any news story. While the incidence of errors in these summaries is low, and I attempt to spot-check details, AI tools can hallucinate. Please click through and read the articles for details (some may be paywalled).